![]() Windows is so far not designed for this, it has less to do with the apps itself. I only listed these three off the top o'my head. have to administer multiple computers, and installing the same SW on more than 3 PCs is a complete drag.įeel free to think of many other such revolutionary use scenarios. simply do not want to install stuff on their Windows PCs, given the awful quality of software these days, which, once installed, could easily screw up your computer ģ. think that running PortableApps from a USB dongle is excruciatingly slow Ģ. This would win the hearts of those who:ġ. Surely enough, whoever doesn't want to use PortableApps in this way, they shouldn't thus use it: it's all about providing a choice. could officially open the doors to such revolutionary use of their application. With minor coding effort, PortableApps devs. I've been running it this way ever since Dropbox came about, and I can tell ya that it's mighty awesome. It certainly doesn't hurt to think outside the box a little. open themselves to this type of usage scenario-unless, of course, they are allergic to any idea of progress. Now, I know that this is not something PortableApps has been designed to achieve, however it wouldn't hurt to have PortableApps devs. Briefly, with the advent of cloud-syncing applications (Dropbox etc.), it makes the utmost sense to put your PortableApps folder in Dropbox, and hence have it automatically available on every Dropbox-synced computer you may come across. This would escalate its status considerably, at a very small developing cost. This goes hand in hand with the idea that PortableApps, while a nice little application for emergency situations, could develop nicely into something akin to a full-blown portable operating system-i.e. Yep, there's a longer story as why one would want to designate a PortableApps browser as the default Windows browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |